Before you continue reading this newsletter,
please tell us what you see in this picture
Your Web group has created a persuasive and engaging Web site. Your user data stream shows that your customers are doing more on your site. Your usability data stream shows that they are also doing so more successfully.
More impressively, your design team has conducted careful, thoughtful research to beat banner blindness. They have explored the consumers' information needs and decision patterns. They've leveraged the site-use metrics to learn how consumers react to different design patterns. They've used this knowledge to optimize the placement of persuasive up-sell/cross-sell elements. They know that when, where and how you place ad elements counts as much as how the ad elements works.
The Web is an important part of your organization's home-country communication outreach and contributes substantially to your local success. But your organization is global. And based on the success of the site, top management has decided that your transaction-based Web site should be global, as well.
What does this mean for your site? Will the findings of your careful and thoughtful research program on persuasive design and advertisements placement generalize to a cross-cultural design space? Does the decision-making path look the same? We have (roughly) the same brains, don't we? We should notice the same stuff, right?
The Web continues to emerge as a first resource for consumer information. Marketing across cultural boundaries seems to be an efficient approach to going global. Is it optimally effective?
Take some time to surf the Net across countries. Look at some European Union sites. Then look at some Asian sites (India, China, Japan). When we ask people to do this exercise, they often identify sites that don't fit their expectations and say, "Oh, those places... they are just behind in the adoption of Web technologies, so their Web site designs are still messy and cluttered. In a few years, they will look more like ours." It may be so ‚Äď presently ‚Äď that their sites will begin to look more like ours. Or, maybe ours will begin to look more like theirs. But it's not clear that the reason theirs look different now is that they are lagging behind. There are great designers all over. They may be designing to the beat of a different drum.
Consider this study: Masuda and Nisbett (2001) present evidence that when asked to describe the same picture, Japanese participants reported 60% more information about the background than Americans did. Further, Japanese participants observed background changes more accurately than Americans. In contrast, Americans reported more details about the image's central object. Americans were also better at recognizing the same object against a new background.
Nisbett and colleagues chalk this up to different cognitive processing style. Americans (and Westerners) they say are more analytic. They pay more attention to the focal object. They analyze its attributes and strive to assign the central object to a specific category. In contrast, East Asians tend to pay more attention to the broader context. They focus less on the specific objects and more on the relationships between them. East Asians take a more holistic approach.
This is an intriguing difference. But how do we apply it to Web design? Effective designers guide their users' attention using visuals. To create effective, persuasive interactions, designers need to know what draws attention and where viewers' eyes linger.
The two groups in Masuda and Nisbett's research saw the same picture. But they reported different things. What happened? Did the participants look at the same parts of the same picture and just remember different things? Or do they actually see the picture differently ‚Äď looking at and lingering on different elements?
Copyright ¬© 1993-2005 by The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, all rights reserved - complete citation below.
Chua, Boland, and Nisbett (2005) applied eye-tracking analysis to explore this question. In their study, Chua and colleagues tracked the eye-movements of American and Chinese graduate students as they looked at a series of pictures like those below.
Each picture had a single foreground object on a realistic background. Participants were first asked simply to look at the picture for 3 seconds and say how much they liked it on a scale of 1-7. After rating the images, participants were asked to look at another set and to quickly say if they had seen the central object in the image before. (This parallels Masuda's same focal-point / different-background recognition task.)
Chau and colleagues' findings are consistent with the earlier work. Americans focused on the central object in the scene sooner and looked at it for longer. They tended to be better at recognizing the central object later. In contrast, Chinese participants took a more balanced approach, looking at more and different parts of the scene.
This difference, while subtle, is important because it shows that our cultural experiences have an impact not only on what we see, but on where we look.
Masuda, T. & Nisbett, R.E. (2001). "Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922-934.
Chua, H.F., Boland, J.E., & Nisbett, R.E. (2005). "Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 102(35), 12629-12633.
Figure citation: Volumes 90-102, copyright ¬© 1993-2005 by The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, all rights reserved. Volumes 1-89, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles.
A very interesting article. I keep telling colleagues that cultural differences go deeper than just "they talk and dress funny." It's much more complex, and fascinating.
An intriguing article! I'm a Canadian-born Japanese, born and raised in Canada all my life. After the picture test, I expected my "sight patterns" to resemble that of a North American. I was wrong! My sight pattern resembled my nationality! My parents are first-generation Japanese, and I was brought up in that style. Perhaps the first few years of our lives have a significant impact on how we see things for the rest of our lives?
I find this very interesting, particularly when thinking about corporate branding. Logos often consist of company name and a graphic such as a swirl or blob next to the text of the name. From reading this article it leads me to wonder if people from other nationalities would focus on the text or the graphic elements of the logo more?
Interesting but how does the gender differences of peripheral vision and acuity impact on this?
I'm from India and have lived in the Middle East, and I'm pretty certain that the perception of everyday time in Asia is not cyclic. First, Asia covers a wide swath including Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and East Asia, so try not to make generalizations about Asia. The Middle East and East Asia have very little in common, for example. It is true that Hinduism proposes that eras are cyclic, but not all Hindus take this literally or consider it at all. Each era is vastly longer than a person's lifetime, though, so it doesn't affect the everyday perception of time even among those who do take it literally.
Could have added to the article if we had samples (print screens of Web sites) to support the article. Again visual senses prevail over all.
I can across some interesting cultural issues recently during some work we carried out for a large global brand. Specifically we were designing instruction graphics that would need to be understood without translation. We were using icons to indicate the right and wrong way to complete tasks. Our research lead us to discover that western and eastern interpretation of common symbols are widely different. In Asia a circle stands for "good" while the western "tick" has no significance at all. Never underestimate the cultural nuance!
1. The picture you gave at the beginning had no instructions about how long one was to examine it.
2. It was hard to decode some of the objects (clarity).
3. Having asked us to do you a favor by looking at the photo, it would be nice to know how others saw it.
Sign up to get our Newsletter delivered straight to your inbox
HFI may use ‚Äúcookies‚ÄĚ or ‚Äúweb beacons‚ÄĚ to track how Users use the Website. A cookie is a piece of software that a web server can store on Users‚Äô PCs and use to identify Users should they visit the Website again. Users may adjust their web browser software if they do not wish to accept cookies. To withdraw your consent after accepting a cookie, delete the cookie from your computer.
HFI believes that every User should know how it utilizes the information collected from Users. The Website is not directed at children under 13 years of age, and HFI does not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from children under 13 years of age online. Please note that the Website may contain links to other websites. These linked sites may not be operated or controlled by HFI. HFI is not responsible for the privacy practices of these or any other websites, and you access these websites entirely at your own risk. HFI recommends that you review the privacy practices of any other websites that you choose to visit.
HFI is based, and this website is hosted, in the United States of America. If User is from the European Union or other regions of the world with laws governing data collection and use that may differ from U.S. law and User is registering an account on the Website, visiting the Website, purchasing products or services from HFI or the Website, or otherwise using the Website, please note that any personally identifiable information that User provides to HFI will be transferred to the United States. Any such personally identifiable information provided will be processed and stored in the United States by HFI or a service provider acting on its behalf. By providing your personally identifiable information, User hereby specifically and expressly consents to such transfer and processing and the uses and disclosures set forth herein.
In the course of its business, HFI may perform expert reviews, usability testing, and other consulting work where personal privacy is a concern. HFI believes in the importance of protecting personal information, and may use measures to provide this protection, including, but not limited to, using consent forms for participants or ‚Äúdummy‚ÄĚ test data.
HFI may use personally identifiable information collected through the Website for the specific purposes for which the information was collected, to process purchases and sales of products or services offered via the Website if any, to contact Users regarding products and services offered by HFI, its parent, subsidiary and other related companies in order to otherwise to enhance Users‚Äô experience with HFI. HFI may also use information collected through the Website for research regarding the effectiveness of the Website and the business planning, marketing, advertising and sales efforts of HFI. HFI does not sell any User information under any circumstances.
HFI may disclose personally identifiable information collected from Users to its parent, subsidiary and other related companies to use the information for the purposes outlined above, as necessary to provide the services offered by HFI and to provide the Website itself, and for the specific purposes for which the information was collected. HFI may disclose personally identifiable information at the request of law enforcement or governmental agencies or in response to subpoenas, court orders or other legal process, to establish, protect or exercise HFI‚Äôs legal or other rights or to defend against a legal claim or as otherwise required or allowed by law. HFI may disclose personally identifiable information in order to protect the rights, property or safety of a User or any other person. HFI may disclose personally identifiable information to investigate or prevent a violation by User of any contractual or other relationship with HFI or the perpetration of any illegal or harmful activity. HFI may also disclose aggregate, anonymous data based on information collected from Users to investors and potential partners. Finally, HFI may disclose or transfer personally identifiable information collected from Users in connection with or in contemplation of a sale of its assets or business or a merger, consolidation or other reorganization of its business.
If a User includes such User‚Äôs personally identifiable information as part of the User posting to the Website, such information may be made available to any parties using the Website. HFI does not edit or otherwise remove such information from User information before it is posted on the Website. If a User does not wish to have such User‚Äôs personally identifiable information made available in this manner, such User must remove any such information before posting. HFI is not liable for any damages caused or incurred due to personally identifiable information made available in the foregoing manners. For example, a User posts on an HFI-administered forum would be considered Personal Information as provided by User and subject to the terms of this section.
Information about Users that is maintained on HFI‚Äôs systems or those of its service providers is protected using industry standard security measures. However, no security measures are perfect or impenetrable, and HFI cannot guarantee that the information submitted to, maintained on or transmitted from its systems will be completely secure. HFI is not responsible for the circumvention of any privacy settings or security measures relating to the Website by any Users or third parties.
Human Factors International, Inc.
PO Box 2020
1680 highway 1, STE 3600
Fairfield IA 52556
HFI reserves the right to cancel any course up to 14 (fourteen) days prior to the first day of the course. Registrants will be promptly notified and will receive a full refund or be transferred to the equivalent class of their choice within a 12-month period. HFI is not responsible for travel expenses or any costs that may be incurred as a result of cancellations.
$100 processing fee if cancelling within two weeks of course start date.
4 Pack + Exam registration: Rs. 10,000 per participant processing fee (to be paid by the participant) if cancelling or transferring the course (4 Pack-CUA/CXA) registration before three weeks from the course start date. No refund or carry forward of the course fees if cancelling or transferring the course registration within three weeks before the course start date.
Individual Modules: Rs. 3,000 per participant ‚Äėper module‚Äô processing fee (to be paid by the participant) if cancelling or transferring the course (any Individual HFI course) registration before three weeks from the course start date. No refund or carry forward of the course fees if cancelling or transferring the course registration within three weeks before the course start date.
Exam: Rs. 3,000 per participant processing fee (to be paid by the participant) if cancelling or transferring the pre agreed CUA/CXA exam date before three weeks from the examination date. No refund or carry forward of the exam fees if requesting/cancelling or transferring the CUA/CXA exam within three weeks before the examination date.
There will be no audio or video recording allowed in class. Students who have any disability that might affect their performance in this class are encouraged to speak with the instructor at the beginning of the class.
The course and training materials and all other handouts provided by HFI during the course are published, copyrighted works proprietary and owned exclusively by HFI. The course participant does not acquire title nor ownership rights in any of these materials. Further the course participant agrees not to reproduce, modify, and/or convert to electronic format (i.e., softcopy) any of the materials received from or provided by HFI. The materials provided in the class are for the sole use of the class participant. HFI does not provide the materials in electronic format to the participants in public or onsite courses.