Maybe it was the early adopter thing. Curiosity about new gadgets. Wanting to touch. To play. To decide if that new little thing will be the next big thing.
Maybe it was the road warrior-reader thing: I travel a lot. And I read a lot. Which book should I take?
Maybe it was the attention deficit thing. Reading one book at a time gets... boring. And all those books get heavy.
However you explain it, I own a Kindle2.
It's been an interesting ride. I'm ready to get off the bike.
A small detail in the Kindle ad tipped my decision to try it. Unless you've spent years thinking about the psychology of reading, you probably won't notice it.
The text on the right side of the "page" is not right-justified. It has a ragged-right edge. And that, for me, was tantalizing.
In right-justified text, the size of spaces between words is varied to make the lines come out even. The size of the spaces is irregular but not meaningful. The goal is just to make the lines come out even. But your brain registers that the spaces are different sizes. And it tries to sort out what that information conveys. Trying to interpret signals that are noise slows you down and makes reading feel more effortful.
To be sure, part of the fun of Kindle is that Amazon had to balance a lot of design options. For instance, they tried to create an unpacking-the-product-should-be-emotional experience. For an Apple native, that was a bit weird. Somehow, the pull-off paper zipper (think FedEX envelopes) sets the wrong tone. But, they tried.
Out of the box, my first impression was positive: It's smaller than I thought. The text resolution is better than I had hoped.
But then, there is no backlight. This means the battery lasts a really long time. But it also means the screen is surprisingly grey and the text contrast is low. And you still need a nightlight to read.
The keyboard lets you annotate while you read. But it's awkward. Big. That choice seems odd since the bigger keyboard means a smaller reading screen. We were all trained to type on phone-sized keyboards, weren't we?
Navigating isn't bad. The fact that the Menu button takes you to Shop At the Kindle Store is irritating. Even if I understand why it's so. The joystick offers a few surprises, such as, you can't turn pages with it.
But these problems are red herring(s). Kindle isn't really about unpacking and navigating. It's about reading. Unfortunately, the reading part is where Amazon goes wrong.
It may seem counter intuitive that a small detail like where lines end would make text easier to read. If it's true, why do publishers of books, journals, magazines, and newspapers right-justify everything? It's a question that a lot of us who think about reading think about a lot.
Our most charitable guess is that publishers think right-justified text looks better. It does. If you like rectangles. But the research shows people read ragged-right copy faster than right-justified copy (Hartley & Burnhill,1971; Jandreau & Bever (1992). So, to justify or not to justify depends on whether the goal is a prettier page or an easier read.
I vote for easier to read. And that is why I was enticed by the raggedy-edged kindle.
And the first publication I opened (the New Yorker) lived up to the promise: Hertzberg, in ragged right. With the cartoons thoughtfully aggregated into one section. Joy.
But the second one I opened (Nudge; Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness), and the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth (White Tiger: A Novel; I was told there'd be cake (Essays); Technology Review; and the Wall Street Journal, respectively) all have right-justified text. Gain the buyer's trust. Violate the buyer's trust.
To be fair, it may not be Amazon that is making the choice. But, they could. And if any single group can make reading better, it is Amazon. Well, maybe Amazon and ReadSmart.
Actually, there's more to enhancing readability than where lines end. Remember how the random size of spaces between words in right-justified text undermines reading? The reverse is also true: Bever and colleagues, Linguists and Psychologists at the University of Arizona, have shown that when line-ends and space-sizes offer clues to how words should be grouped, reading is faster and feels easier (Bever, Jandreau, Burwell, Kaplan & Zaenan, 1990; Jandreau & Bever,1992, among many others.)
To show this, Bever and team engineered (and patented) a text processing/formatting algorithm (which they call ReadSmart) that "reads" text input and adjusts inter- and intra-word spacing based on psychologically tested, linguistic rules. The new, meaningful spaces guide readers' eyes and helps them to group the words correctly even as they read. "ReadSmarted" text is easier to read because part of the work of reading is already done for you. But unlike other text formatting algorithms, ReadSmart improves readability without changing the length of the text, or the way it looks on the surface.
Bever's early studies of linguistic formatting (including more than 500 students in the U.S. and abroad) showed when the spaces between/within words predict the structure, comprehension and reading speed increase up to 20%. Similar comprehension improvements have been documented for readers under duress and second language readers.
More recent industry studies suggest that improving readability and comprehension may also increase persuasiveness. The scenario supposedly goes something like this:
Even if the scenario is not exactly right, the effect of formatting text to improve readability is profound. Direct mail donor acquisition letters that are formatted by ReadSmart work better. In a meta-analysis of 5 direct marketing campaigns (over multiple charities) reaching 393,000 households, the formatted letters triggered 22% more responses than donor letters with standard text. And, people who responded to formatted solicitations ultimately donated more (48% more on average)1.
Ultimately, linguistically-informed text formatting algorithms like ReadSmart make text more persuasive by reducing the mental burden of reading. Readers understand better with less effort. By extension, organizations and agencies that apply these algorithms can benefit, as well. And that promise makes ReadSmart tantalizing. Sort of like the Kindle2 was. And could be again. If Amazon made "ReadSmart my book" the default menu item. Until then, I'm going back to paperbacks. [The ReadSmart text formatting algorithm improves readability on paper, in fixed-width websites and mobile phones. To learn more go to www.readsmart.com.]
1 To be sure, the scale of the behavior change resulting from ReadSmarting text makes it feel a bit like a but-wait!-there's more! paid-for-TV commercial. I'd be far more skeptical, if I didn't have direct knowledge of the psycholinguistic research behind text-formatting generally and ReadSmart specifically. (Fair balance: Bever was my thesis advisor.)
Anglin, J. M., & Miller, G. A. (1968). The role of phrase structure in the recall of meaningful verbal material. Psychonomic Science, 10, 343‚Äď344.
Bever, T. G., & Robbart, J. (2008). System and method of determining phrasing in text. U.S. Patent No. 7,346,489. Washington, DC: U. S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Bever, T. G., & Robbart, J. (2008). System and method for formatting text according to phrasing. Patent pending. Washington, DC: U. S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Bever, T. G., & Robbart, J. (2006). System and method for formatting text according to linguistic, visual and psychological variables. U.S. Patent No. 7,069,508. Washington, DC: U. S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Bever, T. G., Nicholas, C. D., Hancock, R., Alcock, K. W., & Jandreau, S. M. (2007). System, plug-in and method for improving text composition by modifying character prominence according to assigned character information measures. Patent pending. Washington, DC: U. S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Bever, T. G., Jandreau, S., Burwell, R. , Kaplan, R., & Zaenan, A. (1990). Spacing printed text to isolate major phrases improves readability. Visible Language, 25, 74‚Äď87.
Coleman, E. B., & Kim, I. (1961). Comparison of several styles of typography in English. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 262‚Äď267.
Hartley, J. (1980). Spatial cues in text. Visible Language, 14, 67‚Äď79.
Hartley, J., & Burnhill, P. (1971). Experiments with unjustified text. Visible Language, 5, 265‚Äď278.
Jandreau, S., & Bever, T. G. (1992). Phrase-spaced formats improve comprehension in average readers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 143‚Äď146.
Nicholas, C. D., Maher, J. Ashley, K. L., Berendt, L. H. (2009). System and method for converting the digital typesetting documents used in publishing to a device-specific format for electronic publishing. Patent pending. Washington, DC: U. S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Klare, G. R., Nichols, W. H., & Shufford, E. H. (1957). The relationship of typographic arrangement to the learning of technical material. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 41‚Äď45.
Mason, J. M., & Kendall, J. R. (1979). Facilitating reading comprehension through text structure manipulation. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 25, 68‚Äď76.
North, A. J., & Jenkins, L. B. (1951). Reading speed and comprehension as a function of typography. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 225‚Äď228.
Visual-syntactic text formatting takes the "ReadSmart" algorithms to the next level ‚Äď converting blocks of text into cascading-phrase patterns, in which the left edge of indentation also denotes hierarchical relations between phrases.
Sign up to get our Newsletter delivered straight to your inbox
HFI may use ‚Äúcookies‚ÄĚ or ‚Äúweb beacons‚ÄĚ to track how Users use the Website. A cookie is a piece of software that a web server can store on Users‚Äô PCs and use to identify Users should they visit the Website again. Users may adjust their web browser software if they do not wish to accept cookies. To withdraw your consent after accepting a cookie, delete the cookie from your computer.
HFI believes that every User should know how it utilizes the information collected from Users. The Website is not directed at children under 13 years of age, and HFI does not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from children under 13 years of age online. Please note that the Website may contain links to other websites. These linked sites may not be operated or controlled by HFI. HFI is not responsible for the privacy practices of these or any other websites, and you access these websites entirely at your own risk. HFI recommends that you review the privacy practices of any other websites that you choose to visit.
HFI is based, and this website is hosted, in the United States of America. If User is from the European Union or other regions of the world with laws governing data collection and use that may differ from U.S. law and User is registering an account on the Website, visiting the Website, purchasing products or services from HFI or the Website, or otherwise using the Website, please note that any personally identifiable information that User provides to HFI will be transferred to the United States. Any such personally identifiable information provided will be processed and stored in the United States by HFI or a service provider acting on its behalf. By providing your personally identifiable information, User hereby specifically and expressly consents to such transfer and processing and the uses and disclosures set forth herein.
In the course of its business, HFI may perform expert reviews, usability testing, and other consulting work where personal privacy is a concern. HFI believes in the importance of protecting personal information, and may use measures to provide this protection, including, but not limited to, using consent forms for participants or ‚Äúdummy‚ÄĚ test data.
HFI may use personally identifiable information collected through the Website for the specific purposes for which the information was collected, to process purchases and sales of products or services offered via the Website if any, to contact Users regarding products and services offered by HFI, its parent, subsidiary and other related companies in order to otherwise to enhance Users‚Äô experience with HFI. HFI may also use information collected through the Website for research regarding the effectiveness of the Website and the business planning, marketing, advertising and sales efforts of HFI. HFI does not sell any User information under any circumstances.
HFI may disclose personally identifiable information collected from Users to its parent, subsidiary and other related companies to use the information for the purposes outlined above, as necessary to provide the services offered by HFI and to provide the Website itself, and for the specific purposes for which the information was collected. HFI may disclose personally identifiable information at the request of law enforcement or governmental agencies or in response to subpoenas, court orders or other legal process, to establish, protect or exercise HFI‚Äôs legal or other rights or to defend against a legal claim or as otherwise required or allowed by law. HFI may disclose personally identifiable information in order to protect the rights, property or safety of a User or any other person. HFI may disclose personally identifiable information to investigate or prevent a violation by User of any contractual or other relationship with HFI or the perpetration of any illegal or harmful activity. HFI may also disclose aggregate, anonymous data based on information collected from Users to investors and potential partners. Finally, HFI may disclose or transfer personally identifiable information collected from Users in connection with or in contemplation of a sale of its assets or business or a merger, consolidation or other reorganization of its business.
If a User includes such User‚Äôs personally identifiable information as part of the User posting to the Website, such information may be made available to any parties using the Website. HFI does not edit or otherwise remove such information from User information before it is posted on the Website. If a User does not wish to have such User‚Äôs personally identifiable information made available in this manner, such User must remove any such information before posting. HFI is not liable for any damages caused or incurred due to personally identifiable information made available in the foregoing manners. For example, a User posts on an HFI-administered forum would be considered Personal Information as provided by User and subject to the terms of this section.
Information about Users that is maintained on HFI‚Äôs systems or those of its service providers is protected using industry standard security measures. However, no security measures are perfect or impenetrable, and HFI cannot guarantee that the information submitted to, maintained on or transmitted from its systems will be completely secure. HFI is not responsible for the circumvention of any privacy settings or security measures relating to the Website by any Users or third parties.
Human Factors International, Inc.
PO Box 2020
1680 highway 1, STE 3600
Fairfield IA 52556
HFI reserves the right to cancel any course up to 14 (fourteen) days prior to the first day of the course. Registrants will be promptly notified and will receive a full refund or be transferred to the equivalent class of their choice within a 12-month period. HFI is not responsible for travel expenses or any costs that may be incurred as a result of cancellations.
$100 processing fee if cancelling within two weeks of course start date.
4 Pack + Exam registration: Rs. 10,000 per participant processing fee (to be paid by the participant) if cancelling or transferring the course (4 Pack-CUA/CXA) registration before three weeks from the course start date. No refund or carry forward of the course fees if cancelling or transferring the course registration within three weeks before the course start date.
Individual Modules: Rs. 3,000 per participant ‚Äėper module‚Äô processing fee (to be paid by the participant) if cancelling or transferring the course (any Individual HFI course) registration before three weeks from the course start date. No refund or carry forward of the course fees if cancelling or transferring the course registration within three weeks before the course start date.
Exam: Rs. 3,000 per participant processing fee (to be paid by the participant) if cancelling or transferring the pre agreed CUA/CXA exam date before three weeks from the examination date. No refund or carry forward of the exam fees if requesting/cancelling or transferring the CUA/CXA exam within three weeks before the examination date.
There will be no audio or video recording allowed in class. Students who have any disability that might affect their performance in this class are encouraged to speak with the instructor at the beginning of the class.
The course and training materials and all other handouts provided by HFI during the course are published, copyrighted works proprietary and owned exclusively by HFI. The course participant does not acquire title nor ownership rights in any of these materials. Further the course participant agrees not to reproduce, modify, and/or convert to electronic format (i.e., softcopy) any of the materials received from or provided by HFI. The materials provided in the class are for the sole use of the class participant. HFI does not provide the materials in electronic format to the participants in public or onsite courses.